home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1994
/
june94.doc
/
000278_owner-lightwave-l _Mon Jun 27 20:52:21 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-03-23
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom) id TAA22273; Mon, 27 Jun 1994 19:59:23 -0700
Received: from ucsu.Colorado.EDU by mail.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom) id TAA22210; Mon, 27 Jun 1994 19:58:53 -0700
Received: (from hurtt@localhost) by ucsu.Colorado.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9/CNS-3.5) id UAA09580 for lightwave-l@netcom.com; Mon, 27 Jun 1994 20:57:18 -0600
From: HURTT CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL <hurtt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Message-Id: <199406280257.UAA09580@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Subject: Re: Pgp/uue Image transfer
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 1994 20:57:16 -0600 (MDT)
In-Reply-To: <940627095739.682@AFAS.MSFC.NASA.GOV> from "Richard E." at Jun 27, 94 09:57:39 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1093
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
>
> My mail is very unwieldy thanks to all of this noise!!! The news I can
> at least use a news reader and a KILL file, but mail is limited.
>
> It is RARE to have access to people like Allen, and Stuart. I hope they
> aren't getting swampped to the point they have to bail out.
>
> Why did they setup separate toaster list?? because this one was suppose to be
> Lightwave _only_!
>
> Please send thank yous and requests for software DIRECTLY to the author.
> It does no one else on the list any good. Your message merely clutters
> everybody's mailbox.
>
> Richard Norman
Just like to add my voice in agreement with Richard. A suggestion for
the list: perhaps the list server could prefix outgoing messages with 'LW:'
For example-
LW: Is three Raptors enough?
LW: Re:Will animate for food!
The script would of course have to be smart enough to strip out any
previous 'LW:'s that would be made by replying (as in example #2). Is this
a ludicrous idea? I'm sure most of us would like to be able to see with a glance
weither any personal mail has arrived in our mbox.
Chris